7 pages, 3 figures
The gravitational redshift induced by stellar surface gravity is notoriously difficult to measure for non-degenerate stars, since its amplitude is small in comparison with the typical Doppler shift induced by stellar radial velocity. In this study, we make use of the large observational data set of the Gaia mission to achieve a significant reduction of noise caused by these random stellar motions. By measuring the differences in velocities between the components of pairs of co-moving stars and wide binaries, we are able to statistically measure gravitational redshift and nullify the effect of the peculiar motions of the stars. For the subset of stars considered in this study, we find a positive correlation between the observed differences in Gaia radial velocities and the differences in surface gravity inferred from effective temperature and luminosity measurements. This corresponds to the first ever measurement of extra-Solar surface gravity induced gravitational redshift in non-degenerate stars. Additionally, we study the sub-dominant effects of convective blueshifting of emission lines, effects of binary motion, and possible systematic errors in radial velocity measurements within Gaia. Results from the technique presented in this study are expected to improve significantly with data from the next Gaia data release. Such improvements could be used to constrain the mass-luminosity relation and stellar models which predict the magnitude of convective blueshift.
21 pages, 14 figures, 1 table, submitted to AAS journals
Hot stars with hot Jupiters have a wide range of obliquities, while cool stars with hot Jupiters tend to have low obliquities. An enticing explanation for this pattern is tidal realignment of the cool host stars, but this explanation requires that obliquity damping occurs faster than orbital decay, which is unclear. Here we revisit this tidal realignment problem, building on previous work identifying a low-frequency component of the time-variable tidal potential that affects the obliquity but not the orbital separation. We adopt a recent empirically-based model for the stellar tidal quality factor and its sharp increase with forcing frequency. This leads to enhanced dissipation at low frequencies, and efficient obliquity damping. We model the tidal evolution of 46 observed hot Jupiters orbiting cool stars. A key parameter is the stellar age, which we determine in a homogeneous manner for the sample, taking advantage of Gaia DR2 data. We explore a variety of tidal histories and futures for each system, finding in most cases that the stellar obliquity is successfully damped before the planet is destroyed. A testable prediction of our model is that hot-Jupiter hosts with orbital periods shorter than 2-3 days should have obliquities much smaller than $1^\circ$. With the possible exception of WASP-19b, the predicted future lifetimes of the planets range from $10^8$ yr to more than $10^{10}$ yr. Thus, these hot Jupiters are probably not in immediate danger of being devoured by their host stars.
Submitted as note to Icarus
submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics (A&A), 23 pages, 21 figures
19 pages, 16 figures, 4 tables, accepted in Astroparticle Physics
Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 9 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Accepted
22 pages, 12 figures, Accepted for publication in A&A, final version
22 pages, 13 figures, plus an additional 24 pages and 19 figures in appendices. Accepted for publication in AJ
13 pages, 9 figures. Submitted to MNRAS
12 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
23 pages, 19 figures, 4 tables; accepted for publication in ApJS
7 page, 3 figures. Accepted to ApJL
Submitted to A&A; 21 pages, 27 figures
Published in SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation 2020, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VIII 14 pages, 7 figures
10 pages, 5 figures, to appear in edited form in ESO Messenger 182 | 2021
21 pages, submitted to ApJ. Data available online this https URL
Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 16 pages, 16 figures
15+66 pages, 11+65 figures, 3 tables. In press with MNRAS
8 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication by MNRAS
13 pages, 6 figures, to be submitted to MNRAS
30 pages, 19 figures, Submitted to A&A, Revised version
Accepted to appear in MNRAS; 13 pages, 5 figures, 6 tables
16 figures, 3 appendices, 28 pages. MNRAS, in press
17 pages, 14 figures, Accepted in ApJ
5 pages, 1 figure, in response to Steinhardt et al. ( arXiv:2101.12738 )
6 pages, 3 figures
15 pages, 9 figures
22 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in PRD
11 pages,9 figures
12 figures, 3 tables
Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. 19 pages, 13 figures
24 pages, 10 figures, comments welcome!
30 pages, 19 figures, accepted in the Astrophysical Journal
14 pages, 13 figures, accepted by MNRAS
MNRAS accepted; 12 pages, 8 figures
Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Accepted on Advances in Space Research
12 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables
22 pages, 22 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication by Physics of Plasmas
9 pages, 3 figures
Accepted for publication in MNRAS
7 pages, 6 figures
24 pages, 10 figures (including two-panel Figure 8), to be published in ApJ
10 pages, 6 figures, comments welcome
16 pages, 1 figure, 1 table
48 pages, 21 figures
20+ pages, lots of pictures
9 pages; 2 figures; 1 Table; accepted on EPJ C
20 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
33 pages, 8 figures