15 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables
We quantify the information content of the non-linear matter power spectrum, the halo mass function, and the void size function, using the Quijote N-body simulations. We find that these three statistics exhibit very different degeneracies amongst the cosmological parameters, and thus the combination of all three probes enables the breaking of degeneracies, in turn yielding remarkably tight constraints. We perform a Fisher analysis using the full covariance matrix, including all auto- and cross-correlations, finding that this increases the information content for neutrino mass compared to a correlation-free analysis. The multiplicative improvement of the constraints on the cosmological parameters obtained by combining all three probes compared to using the power spectrum alone are: 137, 5, 8, 20, 10, and 43, for $\Omega_m$, $\Omega_b$, $h$, $n_s$, $\sigma_8$, and $M_\nu$, respectively. The marginalized error on the sum of the neutrino masses is $\sigma(M_\nu)=0.018\,{\rm eV}$ for a cosmological volume of $1\,(h^{-1}{\rm Gpc})^3$, using $k_{\max}=0.5\,h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, and without CMB priors. We note that this error is an underestimate insomuch as we do not consider super-sample covariance, baryonic effects, and realistic survey noises and systematics. On the other hand, it is an overestimate insomuch as our cuts and binning are suboptimal due to restrictions imposed by the simulation resolution. Given upcoming galaxy surveys will observe volumes spanning $\sim 100\,(h^{-1}{\rm Gpc})^3$, this presents a promising new avenue to measure neutrino mass without being restricted by the need for accurate knowledge of the optical depth, which is required for CMB-based measurements. Furthermore, the improved constraints on other cosmological parameters, notably $\Omega_m$, may also be competitive with CMB-based measurements.
We present a revised characterisation of the previously discovered transiting planet systems HATS-34 and HATS-46. We make use of the newly available space-based light curves from the NASA TESS mission and high-precision parallax and absolute photometry measurements from the ESA Gaia mission to determine the mass and radius of the planets and host stars with dramatically increased precision and accuracy compared to published values, with the uncertainties in some parameters reduced by as much as a factor of seven. Using an isochrone based fit, for HATS-34 we measure a revised host star mass and radius of $0.952_{-0.02}^{+0.04}M_S$ and of $0.9381\pm0.0080R_S$, respectively, and a revised mass and radius for the transiting planet of $0.951\pm0.050 M_J$ and $1.282 \pm0.064 R_J$ respectively. Similarly, for HATS-46 we measure a revised mass and radius for the host star of $0.869\pm0.023M_S$, and $0.894\pm0.010 R_S$, respectively, and a revised mass and radius for the planet of $0.158 \pm0.042 M_J$, and $0.951 \pm 0.029 R_J$, respectively. The uncertainties that we determine on the stellar and planetary masses and radii are also substantially lower than re-determinations that incorporate the Gaia results without performing a full re-analysis of the light curves and other observational data. We argue that, in light of Gaia and TESS, a full re-analysis of previously discovered transiting planets is warranted.
12 pages, 7 figures, ApJ, in press
ApJ, in press. 27 pages including 6 figures and 5 tables
11 pages, 8 figures, submitted to MNRAS
15 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted to MNRAS, revised following referee's comments. 22 pages, 15 figures
16 pages, 5 figures, and 1 table in aastex63 format; accepted for publication in AJ
submitted to AAS Journals
Invited review for JGR-Planets special issue "Exoplanets: The Nexus of Astronomy and Geoscience." Accepted for publication. 22 pages + 20 pages of references
20 pages, 12 figures, 5 tables, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
11 pages, 5 figures
Accepted for publication in AJ
Submitted to PASP
46 pages, 11 figures
6 pages, 3 figures. Matches published version in Astronomische Nachrichten
15 pages, 4 figures, accepted to the Planetary Science Journal
24 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables, submitted to ApJ
6 pages, no figures
23 pages, 13 figures. Accepted to ApJ
24 pages; 12 figures; accepted for Astronomical Journal
29 pages, 11 figures, published in Nature Communications
21 pages 16 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
12 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Third Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, Canada
Accepted for publication in MNRAS: 19 pages, 15 figures, 1 table
13 pages, 2 figures
7 pages, 3 figures. Comments welcome
21 Pages, 18 Figures, Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ)
22 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables (one online only ancillary file); accepted in ApJ
17 pages, 14 Figures, accepted for publication on MNRAS
17 pages, 12 figures, submitted to ApJ
9 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables
9 pages, 8 figures, Accepted for publication in the MNRAS main journal
16 pages, 18 figures, 3 tables (1 only at CDS); accepted by Astronomy & Astrophysics
26 pages, 12 figures, submitted to "Solar Physics"
4 pages, 2 figures, conference
50 pages, 14 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in Space Weather
28 pages, 19 figures
22 pages, 12 figures
16 pages, 8 figures, to be published in Journal of Instrumentation (JINST)
8 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
18 pages, 15 figure, accepted by A&A
19 pages, 14 figures
submitted to ApJL
27 pages, 18 figures
9 pages
10 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in ApJ
15 pages, 3 figures
16 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
20+4 pages, 12+3 figures. Comments welcome
16 pages, 8 figures, submitted do A&A, comments are welcome
5 pages, 4 figures
14 pages, 8 figures