19 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to ApJ, comments welcome!
Stars can either be formed in or captured by the accretion disks in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). These AGN stars are irradiated and subject to extreme levels of accretion, which can turn even low-mass stars into very massive ones ($M > 100 {\rm M}_\odot$) whose evolution may result in the formation of massive compact objects ($M > 10 {\rm M}_\odot$). Here we explore the spins of these AGN stars and the remnants they leave behind. We find that AGN stars rapidly spin up via accretion, eventually reaching near-critical rotation rates. They further maintain near-critical rotation even as they shed their envelopes, become compact, and undergo late stages of burning. This makes them good candidates to produce high-spin massive black holes, such as the ones seen by LIGO-Virgo in GW190521g, as well as long Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and the associated chemical pollution of the AGN disk.
4 figures; submitted to apjl
The anisotropy of solar wind turbulence is a critical issue in understanding the physics of energy transfer between scales and energy conversion between fields and particles in the heliosphere. Using the measurement of \emph{Parker Solar Probe} (\emph{PSP}), we present an observation of the anisotropy at kinetic scales in the slow, Alfv\'enic, solar wind in the inner heliosphere. A steepened transition range is found between the inertial and kinetic ranges at all the directions with respect to the local background magnetic field direction. The anisotropy of $k_\perp \gg k_\parallel$ is found evident in both transition and kinetic ranges, with the power anisotropy $P_\perp/P_\parallel > 10$ in the kinetic range leading over that in the transition range and being stronger than that at 1 au. The spectral index varies from $\alpha_{t\parallel}=-5.7\pm 1.3$ to $\alpha_{t\perp}=-3.7\pm 0.3$ in the transition range and $\alpha_{k\parallel}=-2.9\pm 0.2$ to $\alpha_{k\perp}=-2.57\pm 0.07$ in the kinetic range. The corresponding wavevector anisotropy has the scaling of $k_\parallel \sim k_\perp^{2/3}$ in the transition range, and changes to $k_\parallel \sim k_\perp^{1/3}$ in the kinetic range, consistent with the kinetic Alfv\'enic turbulence at sub-ion scales.
submitted to ApJ
The simplest scheme for predicting real galaxy properties after performing a dark matter simulation is to rank order the real systems by stellar mass and the simulated systems by halo mass and then simply assume monotonicity - that the more massive halos host the more massive galaxies. This has had some success, but we study here if a better motivated and more accurate matching scheme is easily constructed by looking carefully at how well one could predict the simulated IllustrisTNG galaxy sample from its dark matter computations. We find that using the dark matter rotation curve peak velocity, $v_{max}$, for normal galaxies reduces the error of the prediction by 30% (18% for central galaxies and 60% for satellite systems) - following expectations from Faber-Jackson and the physics of monolithic collapse. For massive systems with halo mass $>$ 10$^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$ hierarchical merger driven formation is the better model and dark matter halo mass remains the best single metric. Using a new single variable that combines these effects, $\phi$ $=$ $v_{max}$/$v_{max,12.7}$ + M$_{peak}$/(10$^{12.7}$ M$_{\odot}$) allows further improvement and reduces the error, as compared to ranking by dark matter mass at $z=0$ by another 6% from $v_{max}$ ranking. Two parameter fits -- including environmental effects produce only minimal further impact.
24 pages, 19 figures
19 pages, 15 figures, submitted to MNRAS
14 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication on ApJ
27 pages, 23 figures, 3 tables, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
18 pages, 10 figures
28 pages, 22 figures. Accepted for publication in A&A
21 pages, 10 figures, submitted to ApJ
Submitted to Nature Astronomy; 12 pages, 2 figures
15 pages, 12 figures. Submitted to Physical Review D
Submitted to MNRAS
25 pages, 10 figures, 6 tables
13 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
Accepted in February 10, 2021 Submitted to ApJ
16 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
17 pages, 15 figures
14 pages, 4 figures, Accepted in Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy
29 pages, 22 figures
16 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
Version is before editorial comments and typesetting. Solar Physics Version is available as open access
Accepted for publication in Astronomical Journal
8 pages, 7 figures
15 pages, 10 figures
Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics on Feb 12. 2021, submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics on December 17. 2020. 12 pages, 10 figures
19 figures, 1 table, 17 pages
7 pages, 7 figures, submitted to APJ
25 pages, 21 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
20 pages, 6 tables, 11 figures
16 pages, 11 figures, Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Accepted for publication in JAA
10 pages, 8 figures
Accepted for publication in Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 5 years of AstroSat special issue
14 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables, 1 appendix with 3 tables that will be public through Vizier at CDS, accepted by MNRAS
24 pages, 17 figures. Paper submitted to MNRAS
18 pages, 4 figures. Comments welcome
24 pages, 14 figures, submitted to Physical Review D
Draft version of paper, includes new catalogue which is unlikely to change significantly. 4 pages, 3 figures
18 pages, 5 figures
Prepared for submission to Remote Sensing. 18 pages
20 pages, 9 figures
4 pages, 1 figure