11 pages, 6 figures, 1 appendix, submitted to ApJ
The nanohertz gravitational wave background (GWB) is believed to be dominated by GW emission from supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs). Observations of several dual active galactic nuclei (AGN) strongly suggest a link between AGN and SMBHBs, given that these dual AGN systems will eventually form bound binary pairs. Here we develop an exploratory SMBHB population model based on empirically constrained quasar populations, allowing us to decompose the GWB amplitude into an underlying distribution of SMBH masses, SMBHB number density, and volume enclosing the GWB. Our approach also allows us to self-consistently predict the GWB amplitude and the number of local SMBHB systems. Interestingly, we find the local number density of SMBHBs implied by the common-process signal in the NANOGrav 12.5-yr dataset to be roughly five times larger than previously predicted by other models. We also find that at most $\sim 25 \%$ of SMBHBs can be associated with quasars. Furthermore, our quasar-based approach predicts $\gtrsim 95\%$ of the GWB signal comes from $z \lesssim 2.5$, and that SMBHBs contributing to the GWB have masses $\gtrsim 10^8 M_\odot$. We also explore how different empirical galaxy-black hole scaling relations affect the local number density of GW sources, and find that relations predicting more massive black holes decrease the local number density of SMBHBs. Overall, our results point to the important role that a measurement of the GWB will play in directly constraining the cosmic population of SMBHBs, as well as their connections to quasars and galaxy mergers.
10 pages, 5 figures
A nanohertz-frequency stochastic gravitational wave background can potentially be detected through the precise timing of an array of millisecond pulsars. This background produces low-frequency noise in the pulse arrival times that would have a characteristic spectrum common to all pulsars and a well-defined spatial correlation. Recently the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves collaboration (NANOGrav) found evidence for the common-spectrum component in their 12.5-year data set. Here we report on a search for the background using the second data release of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array. If we are forced to choose between the two NANOGrav models $\unicode{x2014}$ one with a common-spectrum process and one without $\unicode{x2014}$ we find strong support for the common-spectrum process. However, in this paper, we consider the possibility that the analysis suffers from model misspecification. In particular, we present simulated data sets that contain noise with distinctive spectra but show strong evidence for a common-spectrum process under the standard assumptions. The Parkes data show no significant evidence for, or against, the spatially correlated Hellings-Downs signature of the gravitational-wave background. Assuming we did observe the process underlying the spatially uncorrelated component of the background, we infer its amplitude to be $A = 2.2^{+0.4}_{-0.3} \times 10^{-15}$ in units of gravitational-wave strain at a frequency of $1\, \text{yr}^{-1}$. Extensions and combinations of existing and new data sets will improve the prospects of identifying spatial correlations that are necessary to claim a detection of the gravitational-wave background.
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
7 pages, 3 figures, Proceedings of the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2021)
Accepted to A&A
8 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
Accepted to AJ; 12 pages, 8 figures
18 pages, 20 figures, 1 appendix. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
7 pages, 4 figures, submitted to A&A, Code available at this https URL: this https URL
47 pages including appendices, 12 figures in main paper, 5 tables in main paper
Accepted for publication in A&A. July 23, 2021
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions. 8 pages, 3 figures
18 pages, 9 figures, submitted to A&A
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions. 8 pages. 16 figures
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
18 pages, 10 figures
13 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted to MNRAS
11 pages, 6 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
Report of virtual meeting. All talks are available online at: this https URL
Comments are welcome
Submitted to Astrophys. J
17 pages, 1 table, 10 figures, submitted
Proceedings of the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021)
8 figures (19 plots), 14 pages
9 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
25 pages, 19 figures
10 pages, 11 figures, Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
13 pages, 4 figures; Phys. Rev. D (in press)
14 pages, 13 figures, accepted by The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. The redshift catalog can be accessed from this http URL or this https URL
22 pages, 7 figures, accepted by Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics
27 pages, 14 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJ on July 24, 2021
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). 8 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
Accepted by ApJ
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
13 pages, 13 figures, 3 tables
25 pages, 16 figures
Published in The Astrophysical Journal
Submitted to ApJ
9 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
9 pages, 5 figures. Suppl. material available on request from authors. Comments welcome
15 pages, 6 figures, 1 table, have been published by ApJ on June 1, 2021
This article has been accepted to the Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA). This article contains 17 pages and 13 figures
Accepted to MNRAS; 26 pages, 13 figures
24 pages, 9 figures, 8 Tables. Accepted for Publication in the Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy
15 pages, 12 figures
14 pages, 7 figures, and 2 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Paper accepted on MNRAS, 24 pages, 18 figures
8 pages, 18 figures
26 pages, 11 figures, 1 table. Article accepted in Astronomy Reports
33 pages, 38 figures, ApJ accepted
11 pages, 29 figures
18 pages, 8 figures, accepted in A&A
Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters: 7 pages, 5 figures
8 pages, 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021), The Astroparticle Physics Conference Proceeding
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
12 pages, 11 figures, submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
43 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
30 pages, 11 figures, submitted to JCAP. Comments welcome
16 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in A&A
Accepted to Springer Space Science Reviews. Chapter in ISSI review "The Tidal Disruption of Stars by Massive Black Holes" vol. 79
25 pages, 6 figures and 5 tables. Submitted to MNRAS. Supplementary contains 23 pages with 8 figures and 1 table
16 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted to MNRAS
16 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables, submitted to ApJ
Accepted for publication in MNRAS, 30 pages, 31 figures
3 pages, 0 figures. Submitted to the Journal of Open Source Software. The repository and issue tracker are available at this https URL . Documentation is available at this https URL
Accepted in AJ. 22 Pages, 12 Figures
Comments are welcome
Accepted at AJ on July 22nd
17 pages, 7 figures, 1 table; AJ, in press
7 pages, 1 figure
12 pages; comments welcome
A draft version
20 pages, 7 figures
Our Python code is available at this https URL
45 Pages, 24 captioned figures
11 pages, 8 captioned figures
9 pages, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1711.07290 , arXiv:1811.07425 by other authors
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021). See arXiv:2107.06966 for all IceCube contributions
5 pages, 3 figures
9 pages, 9 figures, Presented at the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021)
Accepted for publication in Advances in Space Research