(17 pages, 9 figures, Accepted by MNRAS)
Abstract: Assuming that the numerical diffusivity triggered by violations of the force-free electrodynamics constraints is a proxy for the physical resistivity, we examine its impact on the overall dynamics of force-free aligned pulsar magnetospheres endowed with an equatorial current sheet. We assess the constraint violations as a diffusivity source. The effects of modifications on electric fields used to restore force-free conditions are not confined to the equatorial current sheet, but modify the magnetospheric dynamics on timescales shorter than the pulsar rotational period. These corrections propagate especially via a channel that was unexplored, namely, changes induced to the electric charge density, $\rho$. We quantify the global consequences of diffusivity by comparing different techniques to model $\rho$. By default, we combine a conservative $\rho$-evolution with hyperbolic/parabolic cleaning of inaccuracies in the Maxwell equations. As an alternative, we enforce a constrained evolution where $\rho$ is directly computed as the electric field divergence. The conservative approach reduces the Poynting flux dissipated in the equatorial current sheet by an order of magnitude, along with an increase of the pulsar luminosity driven by a shift of the Y-point location. The luminosity changes according to $L_{\rm Y}\propto \alpha^{0.11}$, where $\alpha$ is the ratio of diffusion to advection timescales, controlling the amount of (numerical) diffusivity. Our models suggest interpreting the luminosity dependence on the Y-point location as differences in resistivities encountered at the equatorial current sheet. Alternatively, they could be interpreted in terms of the pair formation multiplicity, $\kappa$, smaller diffusion being consistent with $\kappa\gg 1$.
14 pages, 8 figures, submitted to ApJ, comments welcome!
We present Artificial Stellar Populations (ArtPop), an open-source Python package for synthesizing stellar populations and generating artificial images of fully populated stellar systems. The code is designed to be intuitive to use and as modular as possible, making it possible to use each of its functionalities independently or together. ArtPop has a wide range of scientific and pedagogical use cases, including the measurement of detection efficiencies in current and future imaging surveys, the calculation of integrated stellar population parameters, quantitative comparisons of isochrone models, and the development and validation of astronomical image processing algorithms. In this paper, we give an overview of the ArtPop package, provide simple coding examples to demonstrate its implementation, and present results from some potential applications of the code. We provide links to the source code that created each example and figure throughout the paper. ArtPop is under active development, and we welcome bug reports, feature requests, and code contributions from the community.
16 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to PRD
ApJ, in press
8 pages, 6 figures, submitted to A&A, comments welcome
Accepted for publication in ApJ. 26 pages, 9 figures
After addressing first round of ApJ referee remarks, comments welcome before re-submission
submitted to JCAP
19 pages, 13 figures, 5 tables. Accepted for publication in the Planetary Science Journal
Accepted for publication in A&A
22 pages, 21 figures, 4 tables; accepted by MNRAS (31 July 2021)
9 pages, 5 figures; to be submitted to ApJ. Comments welcome
11 pages, 6 Figures, 1 Table; Proc. SPIE in press
Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics; 18 pages, 13 figures, 12 tables
Accepted for publication in proceedings of 2021 5G World Forum Workshop on Satellite and Non-Terrestrial Networks
27 pages, 17 figures, accepted for publication in AJ
Accepted for publication in MNRAS
accepted for publication in MNRAS, 16 pages
15 pages, 9 figures, Accepted to MNRAS
15 pages, 9 figures. Accepted to ApJ
RNAAS Focus on AAS 238
18 pages, 21 figures. Accepted for publication in A&A
29 pages, 26 figures, accepted to ApJ
Version re-submitted to MNRAS after a positive referee report. 18 pages, 8 figures
13 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables
11 pages with 11 pages of appendices. Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal. Comments welcome
11 pages, 2 Figures; Comments welcome
8 pages, 3 figures, accepted by ApJ
24 pages, 12 figures, 1 Table
Accepted in A&A
Submitted to Physical Review Letters
29 pages, 42 figures, accepted for publication by A&A
12 pages, 2 figures
9 pages, 5 figures, 1 table
Accepted for publication in MNRAS, 15 pages 13 figures
Presented at the 37th ICRC
16 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in ASR
7 pages, 3 figures
28 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
In press
Submitted to A&A, this version includes revisions based on referee comments
17 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables, Proceedings for the ICRC 2021 conference
7 pages, 5 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
9 pages, 4 figures, 1 table
accepted to MNRAS
Submitted to AN for the Proceeding of the XMM-Newton 2021 Workshop. 7 pages, 4 figures
17 pages, 9 figures
Accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society on Sept. 28th, 2021; 27 pages, 3 tables and 3 figures
accepted in MNRAS
19 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
17 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
8 pages, 7 figures , I table
Being submitted to MNRAS. 19 pages, 15 figures
11 pages, 20 figures, submitted to Astroparticle Physics
19 pages, 17 figures
14 pages, 7 figures, A&A accepted
Accepted for publication in MNRAS
24 pages, 15 figures, accepted to AJ
17 pages, 9 figures, to appear in Front. Phys
Accepted in The Astrophysical Journal, 9/21/2021
Accepted for publication in AJ
21 pages, 11 figures, 4 tables
16 pages, 14 figures, to be published on Phys. Rev. C
A review article prepared for the special issue "Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources" in the online journal "Universe" (MDPI)
13 pages, 11 figures
37 pages, 21 figures. This paper is long - but mainly because it is written in an expository/pedagogical manner, is thoroughly signposted, and contains multiple large figures
7 pages, LaTex, no figure
Accepted to Journal of Physics G as a Major Report. Corresponding author: Zach Meisel (meisel@ohio.edu)
20 pages, 21 figures. Submitted to ApJ
29 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, many tau neutrinos; comments welcome!