20+6 pages, 15 figures, data and codes to reproduce the results publicly available at this https URL
Galaxies can be characterized by many internal properties such as stellar mass, gas metallicity, and star-formation rate. We quantify the amount of cosmological and astrophysical information that the internal properties of individual galaxies and their host dark matter halos contain. We train neural networks using hundreds of thousands of galaxies from 2,000 state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations with different cosmologies and astrophysical models of the CAMELS project to perform likelihood-free inference on the value of the cosmological and astrophysical parameters. We find that knowing the internal properties of a single galaxy allow our models to infer the value of $\Omega_{\rm m}$, at fixed $\Omega_{\rm b}$, with a $\sim10\%$ precision, while no constraint can be placed on $\sigma_8$. Our results hold for any type of galaxy, central or satellite, massive or dwarf, at all considered redshifts, $z\leq3$, and they incorporate uncertainties in astrophysics as modeled in CAMELS. However, our models are not robust to changes in subgrid physics due to the large intrinsic differences the two considered models imprint on galaxy properties. We find that the stellar mass, stellar metallicity, and maximum circular velocity are among the most important galaxy properties to determine the value of $\Omega_{\rm m}$. We believe that our results can be explained taking into account that changes in the value of $\Omega_{\rm m}$, or potentially $\Omega_{\rm b}/\Omega_{\rm m}$, affect the dark matter content of galaxies. That effect leaves a distinct signature in galaxy properties to the one induced by galactic processes. Our results suggest that the low-dimensional manifold hosting galaxy properties provides a tight direct link between cosmology and astrophysics.
Submitted to ApJ; main text 19 pages, 12 figures and 5 tables
We present a detailed study of the partial rest-optical ($\lambda_{\mathrm{obs}} \approx 3600-5600\,\r{A}$) spectra of $N = 328$ star-forming galaxies at $0.6 < z < 1.0$ from the Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census (LEGA-C). We compare this sample with low-redshift ($z \sim 0$) galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), intermediate-redshift ($z \sim 1.6$) galaxies from the Fiber Multi-Object Spectrograph (FMOS)-COSMOS Survey, and high-redshift ($z \sim 2$) galaxies from the Keck Baryonic Structure Survey (KBSS). At a lookback time of $6-8\ \mathrm{Gyr}$, galaxies with stellar masses $\mathrm{log}(\mathrm{M_{\ast}/M_{\odot}}) > 10.25$ appear remarkably similar to $z \sim 0$ galaxies in terms of their nebular excitation, as measured using $\mathrm{[O\,III]}\lambda5008 / \mathrm{H}\beta$. There is some evidence that $0.6 < z < 1.0$ galaxies with lower $\mathrm{M_{\ast}}$ have higher $\mathrm{[O\,III]}\lambda5008 / \mathrm{H}\beta$ than $z \sim 0$ galaxies and are more similar to less evolved $z \sim 1.6$ and $z \sim 2$ galaxies, which are offset from the $z \sim 0$ locus at all $\mathrm{M_{\ast}}$. We explore the impact selection effects, contributions from active galactic nuclei, and variations in physical conditions (ionization parameter and gas-phase oxygen abundance) have on the apparent distribution of $\mathrm{[O\,III]}\lambda5008 / \mathrm{H}\beta$ and find somewhat higher ionization and lower enrichment in $0.6 < z < 1.0$ galaxies with lower $\mathrm{M_{\ast}}$ relative to $z \sim 0$ galaxies. We use new near-infrared spectroscopic observations of $N = 53$ LEGA-C galaxies to investigate other probes of enrichment and excitation. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of obtaining complete rest-optical spectra of galaxies in order to disentangle these effects.
7 pages, 2 figures
Accepted for publication in MNRAS. Main manuscript has 21 pages with 8 figures. Supplementary material is available for download under "Ancillary files" or by downloading the source file listed under "Other formats"
38 pages, 23 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
18 pages, 9 figures, comments welcome
16 pages, 15 figures, 6 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
15 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
31 pages, 30 figures, submitted to MNRAS
13 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, 4 appendices (15 pages, 15 figures)
9 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, accepted to ApJL
40 pages, 15 figures, 10 tables; accepted for publication in PASJ
Submitted to ApJL
13 pages, 9 figures, submitted to The Astrophysical Journal
13 pages, 12 figures, accepted to MNRAS
15 pages, 14 figures, 2 tables Submitted to A&A. This is the first in a series of papers, the second (Ruiz-Lara et al.) can be found in this listing
22 pages (12 extra pages in appendix), 16 figures, 13 tables. Submitted to A&A. This paper is the second of a series of papers. Paper I, by L\"ovdal et al., has been submitted simultaneously and can be found in this listing
Accepted for publication in A&A Letters on January 5th
Accepted for publication in A&A
Accepted for publication in ApJ
13 pages, to appear in MNRAS
Accepted to MNRAS; 29 pages; 17 figures
34 pages. 14 figures. 1 figure set. 1 machine-readable table. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Accepted by MNRAS
Accepted for publication in the February 2022 edition of The Observatory. 11 pages, 4 black and white figures, 3 tables
Accepted for publication in the April 2022 edition of The Observatory. 16 pages, 7 black and white figures, 5 tables
9 pages, 1 figure. Comments are welcome!
This paper has been accepted for publication as a AAS Research Note. We have added Table 1 with our Ks-band photometry so that this arXiv submission is self-contained
23 pages; accepted for publication in AAS Journals
13 pages, 13 figures; accepted for publication in MNRAS
26 pages, 22 figures, submitted to MNRAS
24 pages, 8 figures
19 pages, 4 figures
15 pages, 3 figures
14 pages, 8 figures
Accepted for publication in Physics Letters B
5 pages, 4 figures
9 pages, 0 figure, teleparallel gravity, parity violation
21 Pages, 0 figures
11 pages, 5 figures
19 pages, 1 figures, Comments are welcome
Transactions of American Nuclear Society Winter meeting, 125 (1), 400-403, 2021