Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
We report timing analysis of near-infrared (NIR), X-ray, and sub-millimeter (submm) data during a three-day coordinated campaign observing Sagittarius A*. Data were collected at 4.5 micron with the Spitzer Space Telescope, 2-8 keV with the Chandra X-ray Observatory, 3-70 keV with NuSTAR, 340 GHz with ALMA, and at 2.2 micron with the GRAVITY instrument on the Very Large Telescope Interferometer. Two dates show moderate variability with no significant lags between the submm and the infrared at 99% confidence. July 18 captured a moderately bright NIR flare (F_K ~ 15 mJy) simultaneous with an X-ray flare (F ~ 0.1 cts/s) that most likely preceded bright submm flux (F ~ 5.5 Jy) by about +34 (+14 -33) minutes at 99% confidence. The uncertainty in this lag is dominated by the fact that we did not observe the peak of the submm emission. A synchrotron source cooled through adiabatic expansion can describe a rise in the submm once the synchrotron-self-Compton NIR and X-ray peaks have faded. This model predicts high GHz and THz fluxes at the time of the NIR/X-ray peak and electron densities well above those implied from average accretion rates for Sgr A*. However, the higher electron density postulated in this scenario would be in agreement with the idea that 2019 was an extraordinary epoch with a heightened accretion rate. Since the NIR and X-ray peaks can also be fit by a non-thermal synchrotron source with lower electron densities, we cannot rule out an unrelated chance coincidence of this bright submm flare with the NIR/X-ray emission.
9 pages, 8 figures
We describe the correction procedure for Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) differential non-linearities (DNL) adopted in the Bayesian end-to-end BeyondPlanck analysis framework. This method is nearly identical to that developed for the official LFI Data Processing Center (DPC) analysis, and relies on the binned rms noise profile of each detector data stream. However, rather than building the correction profile directly from the raw rms profile, we first fit a Gaussian to each significant ADC-induced rms decrement, and then derive the corresponding correction model from this smooth model. The main advange of this approach is that only samples which are significantly affected by ADC DNLs are corrected. The new corrections are only applied to data for which there is a clear detection of the non-linearities, and for which they perform at least comparably with the DPC corrections. Out of a total of 88 LFI data streams (sky and reference load for each of the 44 detectors) we apply the new minimal ADC corrections in 25 cases, and maintain the DPC corrections in 8 cases. All these correctsion are applited to 44 or 70 GHz channels, while, as in previous analyses, none of the 30 GHz ADCs show significant evidence of non-linearity. By comparing the BeyondPlanck and DPC ADC correction methods, we estimate that the residual ADC uncertainty is about two orders of magnitude below the total noise of both the 44 and 70 GHz channels, and their impact on current cosmological parameter estimation is small. However, we also show that non-idealities in the ADC corrections can generate sharp stripes in the final frequency maps, and these could be important for future joint analyses with HFI, WMAP, or other datasets. We therefore conclude that, although the existing corrections are adequate for LFI-based cosmological parameter analysis, further work on LFI ADC corrections is still warranted.
44 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
22 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Accepted for publication in MNRAS 13 pages, 10 figures. Data release of BPASS v2.3 is available at this http URL and this http URL
19 pages, 14 figures, 3 tables, submitted to ApJ
28 pages, 17 figures. Paper accepted by Space Science Reviews. Based on a paper given at the ISSI Workshop on Heliosphere/Modeling and LISM November 8-12, 2021
64 pages, 23 figures, 2 tables; Accepted for publication in ApJ
11 pages, 6 figures, submitted to A&A
5 pages, 2 figures, submitted to MNRAS
11 pages, 8 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Accepted for publication in ApJ
12 pages, 9 figures
11 pages, 5 figures, To be submitted to A&A
Published in the 'Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy'. Includes 11 pages, 7 figures
9 pages, 7 figures, submitted
13 pages, 4 figures, 1 figure set, 2 tables, published in The Astronomical Journal
6 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters
To be submitted to The Open Journal of Astophysics
Accepted by Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 11 pages, 7 figures
Accepted by ApJS
Accepted by ApJ
8 pages, 3 figures
accepted for publication in MNRAS
16 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
15 pages; 3 multi-panels figures; 2 tables. To appear in proceedings of 16th Marcel Grossmann meeting, July 5-10 2021, World Scientific
5 pages, 3 figures. Accepted by A&A
accepted to MNRAS
13 pages, 7 figures, submitted to MNRAS
19 pages, 3 figures
27 pages, 9 figures. Accepted on 2022 March 23 for publication in MNRAS
A&A, 2022
9 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
contribution to the 2022 Cosmology session of the 56th Rencontres de Moriond
21 pages, 8 Figures, 3 Tables
11 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables; machine-readable tables available as ancillary files; accepted to ApJS
22 pages, 12 figures, 5 tables, submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics. We welcome the comments from readers
11 pages, 5 figures. Submitted to ApJ. Addressed referee report
12 pages, 8 figures + appendices
10 pages, 8 figures
15 pages, 4 figures
18 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in "Physics of the Dark Universe"
41 pages and 2 figures. Accepted for publication in Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.Lond.A (2022)