This Chapter will appear in the Section "Galaxy Clusters" (Section Editors: E. Pointecouteau, E. Rasia, A. Simionescu) of the "Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics" (Editors in chief: C. Bambi and A. Santangelo)
This Chapter provides a brief tutorial on some aspects of plasma physics that are fundamental to understanding the dynamics and energetics of the intracluster medium (ICM). The tutorial is split into two parts: one that focuses on the thermal plasma component -- its stability, viscosity, conductivity, and ability to amplify magnetic fields to dynamical strengths via turbulence and other plasma processes; and one that focuses on the non-thermal population of charged particles known as cosmic rays -- their acceleration, re-acceleration, and transport throughout the cluster volume. Observational context is woven throughout the narrative, from constraints on the strength and geometry of intracluster magnetic fields and the effective viscosity of the ICM, to examples of radio halos, radio relics, and cluster shocks that can test theories of particle acceleration. The promise of future X-ray missions to probe intracluster turbulence and discover the impact of small-scale plasma physics, coupled with sensitive, high-resolution radio observations of synchrotron-emitting plasma that reveal the properties of intracluster magnetic fields and particle-acceleration mechanisms, are likely to establish galaxy clusters as the premier cosmic laboratories for deciphering the fundamental physics of hot, dilute plasmas.
19 pages, 8 figures, submitted to AJ after addressing reviewer comments
Hot Jupiters are generally observed to lack close planetary companions, a trend that has been interpreted as evidence for high-eccentricity migration. We present the discovery and validation of WASP-132 c (TOI-822.02), a 1.85 $\pm$ 0.10 $R_{\oplus}$ planet on a 1.01 day orbit interior to the hot Jupiter WASP-132 b. Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) and ground-based follow-up observations, in conjunction with vetting and validation analysis, enable us to rule out common astrophysical false positives and validate the observed transit signal produced by WASP-132 c as a planet. Running the validation tools \texttt{vespa} and \texttt{triceratops} on this signal yield false positive probabilities of $9.02 \times 10^{-5}$ and 0.0107, respectively. Analysis of archival CORALIE radial velocity data leads to a 3$\sigma$ upper limit of 28.23 ms$^{-1}$ on the amplitude of any 1.01-day signal, corresponding to a 3$\sigma$ upper mass limit of 37.35 $M_{\oplus}$. Dynamical simulations reveal that the system is stable within the 3$\sigma$ uncertainties on planetary and orbital parameters for timescales of $\sim$100 Myr. The existence of a planetary companion near the hot Jupiter WASP-132 b makes the giant planet's formation and evolution via high-eccentricity migration highly unlikely. Being one of just a handful of nearby planetary companions to hot Jupiters, WASP-132 c carries with it significant implications for the formation of the system and hot Jupiters as a population.
submitted to ApJL
21 pages, 18 figures. Comments welcome. Please visit www.thesan-project.com for more details
18 pages, 21 figures, 1 table. Submitted to MNRAS. The g-band catalog of variables and their light curves are available here: this https URL
Accepted to ApJ April 29, 2022
13 pages, 16 figures + appendices, submitted to MNRAS
21 pages, 13 figures. Much more detailed exposition of the method originally presented in the short conference workshop paper arXiv:2011.04673
21 pages, 15 figures. Accepted for publication in A&A. Find the code repository in this https URL and the code documentation in this https URL
23 pages, single column, 6 figures, submitted to Astrophysical Journal
Accepted for publication in A&A. 28 pages (17 of Appendices), 32 figures, 6 tables
22 pages, 20 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
21 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
63 pages, 15 figures, 2 tables, published in Nature on May 4, 2022
26 pages, 19 figures. Accepted for publication in A&A
35 pages, 26 figures, 2 tables. The MATHEMATICA codes related to orbit integration are available via author's GitHub repository at this https URL
5 pages, 3 figures, under review
Submitted to AAS Journals
35 pages, 17 figures; to be submitted
Accepted in ApJ
22 pages, 12 figures, 3 tables
38 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
5 pages, 3 figures, accepted by Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
16 pages, 15 figures
20 pages, 5 figures
10 pages, 8 figures, Accepted for publication in ApJ
20 pages, 9 figures, 8 tables. Accepted for publication to MNRAS
12 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in Physical Review D
36 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
12 pages, 3 figures
3 figures, 1 table, Accepted for publication in Solar Physics
33 pages, 16 figures, submitted to ApJ
12 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables, accepted: Astrophys. Bull., 01, 2022
17 pages, 11 figures, 1 table, ApJ submitted
6 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables
19 pages, 10 figures, accepted by AA
45 pages, 15 figures. Prepared for submission to JCAP. Mock generation code available at this https URL
10 pages, 5 figures, ICRC 2021 contribution
8 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in the Proceedings of the IAU Symposium 362 "Predictive Power of Computational Astrophysics as a Discovery Tool"
11 pages, 7 figures
Submitted to ApJL at April 12, 2022. We are now revising the manuscript with the comments from the referee
16 pages. 5 figures. MNRAS accepted. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2102.04303
17 pages,16 figures, submitted to MNRAS
26 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in AAS PSJ
28 pages, 10 figures, to be published in ApJ
17 pages, 10 figures, accepted in ApJ
20 pages, single column, submitted to Phys. Rev. D. on 9th Feb 2022
12 pages + 4 pages appendices, 10 figures
18 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
5 pages, 4 figures
15 pages
5 pages + appendix, 2 figures
5 pages, submitted to an AAS journal