White Paper submitted to: Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1903.06890
Space plasmas are three-dimensional dynamic entities. Except under very special circumstances, their structure in space and their behavior in time are not related in any simple way. Therefore, single spacecraft in situ measurements cannot unambiguously unravel the full space-time structure of the heliospheric plasmas of interest in the inner heliosphere, in the Geospace environment, or the outer heliosphere. This shortcoming leaves numerous central questions incompletely answered. Deficiencies remain in at least two important subjects, Space Weather and fundamental plasma turbulence theory, due to a lack of a more complete understanding of the space-time structure of dynamic plasmas. Only with multispacecraft measurements over suitable spans of spatial separation and temporal duration can these ambiguities be resolved. We note that these characterizations apply to turbulence across a wide range of scales, and also equally well to shocks, flux ropes, magnetic clouds, current sheets, stream interactions, etc. In the following, we will describe the basic requirements for resolving space-time structure in general, using turbulence' as both an example and a principal target or study. Several types of missions are suggested to resolve space-time structure throughout the Heliosphere.
20 pages, 13 figures; accepted for publication in MNRAS
Aiming at discriminating different gravitational potential models of the Milky Way, we perform tests based on the kinematic data powered by the Gaia DR2 astrometry, over a large range of $(R,z)$ locations. Invoking the complete form of Jeans equations that admit three integrals of motion, we use the independent $R$- and $z$-directional equations as two discriminators ($T_R$ and $T_z$). We apply the formula for spatial distributions of radial and vertical velocity dispersions proposed by Binney et al., and successfully extend it to azimuthal components, $\sigma_\theta(R,z)$ and $V_\theta(R,z)$; the analytic form avoids the numerical artifacts caused by numerical differentiation in Jeans-equations calculation given the limited spatial resolutions of observations, and more importantly reduces the impact of kinematic substructures in the Galactic disk. It turns out that whereas the current kinematic data are able to reject Moffat's Modified Gravity (let alone the Newtonian baryon-only model), Milgrom's MOND is still not rejected. In fact, both the carefully calibrated fiducial model invoking a spherical dark matter (DM) halo and MOND are equally consistent with the data at almost all spatial locations (except that probably both have respective problems at low-$|z|$ locations), no matter which a tracer population or which a meaningful density profile is used. Because there is no free parameter at all in the quasi-linear MOND model we use, and the baryonic parameters are actually fine-tuned in the DM context, such an effective equivalence is surprising, and might be calling forth a transcending synthesis of the two paradigms.
23 pages including appendix, 12 figures (+6 in the appendix), accepted for publication in MNRAS
27 pages, 9 figures
7 pages, 5 figures. MNRAS accepted
Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics. 8 pages, 4 figures, plus appendices
Accepted for publication in PASJ. 14 figures; 8 tables
16 pages, 1 figure, accepted to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
10 pages, 7 figures, submitted to A&A
Accepted, Nov. 2022
24 pages, 9 figures, submitted to ApJ
13 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in ApJ
24 pages, 18 figures, accepted to PASP
Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Accepted by ApJ
24 pages; Submitted to ApJ
Accepted to be published in MNRAS, 20 pages, 3 online tables
14 pages, 1 Table
15 pages, 7 figures, 1 table, submitted to ApJL, comments welcome!
16 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal
19 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Astronomy & Astrophysics, in press; 9 pages, 6 figures
22 pages, 5 figures, full details of 2209.02272 and more
Accepted for publication in ApJ
Accepted for publication in MNRAS
14 pages, 7 figures, 1 table. Accepted by ApJ
Submitted to MNRAS
21 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables
Accepted for publication on A&A
13 pages, 11 figures
Submitted to MNRAS
29 pages, 12 figures, Accepted for publication in ApJ
7 pages, 7 figures, submitted to MNRAS
22 pages, 1 table, 5 figures
18 pages, 14 figures
12 pages. Submitted to ApJ. Comments are welcome
7 pages, 5 figures, submitted to MNRAS
33 pages, 27 figures. Accepted in MNRAS. The algorithm can be found in: this https URL Comments welcome!
13 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables, accepted for publication in A&A
Movie available at this https URL
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Solar Orbiter First Results (Nominal Mission Phase), (in press) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244535
11 pages, 6 figures and 1 table. Accepted for publication in A&A
22 pages, 8 figures, Accepted in MNRAS
13 pages, 8 figures
Accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters; 5 pages, 3 Figures
arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2203.11575
17 pages, 24 figures, 5 tables; Acccepted for publication in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
Accepted for publication in EPJC
12 pages, 5 figures, 1 table, submitted to ApJL. Comments welcome
Accepted in A&A
Global Observatory Control System GOCS
29 pages + references, 5 figures
8 pages, 5 figures, Contribution to Proceedings of Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum XV, August 1-6, 2022, Stavanger, Norway
8 pages, 4 figuures, Contribution to Proceedings of Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum XV, August 1-6, 2022, Stavanger, Norway
16 pages, 8 figures, to appear in Journal of Plasma Physics
21 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables
4 pages, 3 figures, one appendix. comments welcome
5 pages + references, 5 figures, 1 table
26 pages, 14 captioned figures
113 pages
5 pages, 3 figures