The paper was accepted by Geophysical Research Letters on June 16th, 2023
Gravitational-wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM) is a space-borne instrument dedicated to monitoring high-energy transients, including Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes (TGFs) and Terrestrial Electron Beams (TEBs). We implemented a TGF/TEB search algorithm for GECAM, with which 147 bright TGFs, 2 typical TEBs and 2 special TEB-like events are identified during an effective observation time of $\sim$9 months. We show that, with gamma-ray and charged particle detectors, GECAM can effectively identify and distinguish TGFs and TEBs, and measure their temporal and spectral properties in detail. A very high TGF-lightning association rate of $\sim$80\% is obtained between GECAM and GLD360 in east Asia region.
10 Figures, 3 Tables, 1 Appendix
$\textit{Euclid}$ will provide a powerful compilation of data including spectroscopic redshifts, the angular clustering of galaxies, weak lensing cosmic shear, and the cross-correlation of these last two photometric observables. In this study we extend recently presented $\textit{Euclid}$ forecasts into the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)$ cosmological model, a popular extension of the Hilbert-Einstein action that introduces an universal modified gravity force in a scale-dependent way. Our aim is to estimate how well future $\textit{Euclid}$ data will be able to constrain the extra parameter of the theory, $f_{R0}$, for the range in which this parameter is still allowed by current observations. For the spectroscopic probe, we use a phenomenological approach for the scale dependence of the growth of perturbations in the terms related to baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions. For the photometric observables, we use a fitting formula that captures the modifications in the non-linear matter power spectrum caused by the $f(R)$ model. We show that, in an optimistic setting, and for a fiducial value of $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-6}$, $\textit{Euclid}$ alone will be able to constrain the additional parameter $\log f_{R0}$ at the $3\%$ level, using spectroscopic galaxy clustering alone; at the $1.4\%$ level, using the combination of photometric probes on their own; and at the $1\%$ level, using the combination of spectroscopic and photometric observations. This last constraint corresponds to an error of the order of $6 \times 10^{-7}$ at the $1\sigma$ level on the model parameter $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-6}$. We report also forecasted constraints for $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-5}$ and $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-7}$ and show that in the optimistic scenario, $\textit{Euclid}$ will be able to distinguish these models from $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ at more than 3$\sigma$. (abridged)
20 pages, 12 figures, 4 tables, submitted to A&A
We present refined cosmological parameter constraints derived from a cosmic shear analysis of the fourth data release from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000). Our refinements are driven by enhanced galaxy shape measurements using an updated version of the \textit{lens}fit code, and improved shear calibration achieved with a newly developed suite of multi-band image simulations. Additionally, we incorporate recent advancements in cosmological inference from the joint Dark Energy Survey Year 3 and KiDS-1000 cosmic shear analysis. Assuming a spatially flat standard cosmological model, we constrain $S_8\equiv\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.776_{-0.027-0.003}^{+0.029+0.002}$, where the second set of uncertainties accounts for the systematic uncertainties within the shear calibration. These systematic uncertainties stem from minor deviations from realism in the image simulations and the sensitivity of the shear measurement algorithm to the morphology of the galaxy sample. Despite these changes, our results align with previous KiDS studies and other weak lensing surveys, and find a ${\sim}2.3\sigma$ level of tension with the \textit{Planck} cosmic microwave background constraints on $S_8$.
13 pages, 7 figures
The Geminids meteoroid stream produces one of the most intense meteor showers at Earth. It is an unusual stream in that its parent body is understood to be an asteroid, (3200) Phaethon, unlike most streams which are formed via ongoing cometary activity. Until recently, our primary understanding of this stream came from Earth-based measurements of the Geminids meteor shower. However, the Parker Solar Probe (PSP) spacecraft has transited near the core of the stream close to its perihelion and provides a new platform to better understand this unique stream. Here, we create a dynamical model of the Geminids meteoroid stream, calibrate its total density to Earth-based measurements, and compare this model to recent observations of the dust environment near the Sun by PSP. For the formation mechanisms considered, we find the core of the meteoroid stream predominantly lies interior to its parent body orbit and expect grains in the stream to be $\gtrsim$10 $\mu$m in radius. Data-model comparisons of the location of the stream relative to Phaethon's orbit are more consistent with a catastrophic formation scenario, in contrast to cometary formation. Finally, while PSP transits very near the core of the stream, the impact rate expected by Geminids meteoroids is orders of magnitude below the impact rates observed by PSP, and hence undetectable in-situ. We similarly expect the upcoming DESTINY+ mission to be unable to detect appreciable quantities of Geminids grains far from (3200) Phaethon.
10 pages, 5 figures
2023 IEEE Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO)
21 pages, 14 figures, 4 tables. Submitted to ApJ with positive review by the anonymous referee. Comments are welcome
Accepted for publication in ApJ. 26 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables
22 pages, 14 figures, submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics
18 pages, 12 figures; submitted to MNRAS. Comments welcome!
20 pages, 12 figures, 3 tables. Submitted to ApJ
22 pages, 17 figures
12 pages, 9 figures + appendix
15 pages, 13 figures, submitted to A&A
26 pages, 11 figures
30 pages, 12 figures. Accepted for publication in APJS
9 pages, 14 figures, published in MNRAS
Submitted to ApJL, comments welcome
Submitted to ApJL
6 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in RASTI. Supplementary data (including animated figure) available at this https URL
Accepted for publication in ApJ (31 pages, 23 figures and 7 tables)
Published in Nature on June 19th. 2023, 10 figures, 4 tables
20 pages, 11 figures, 4 tables. Submitted to ApJ
9 pages, 3 figures
20 pages. Submission to the NASA Roman Core Community Surveys White Paper Call
LaTeX file in RevTeX 4.1 style, 13 pages, 7 figures
15 pages. Submission to the NASA Roman Core Community Survey White Paper Call
Accepted for publication in ApJ; 20 pages, 9 figures, 4 tables
26 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted to AAS Journals, 4 figures, 2 tables
Accepted to publish in ApJ. 10 pages with 6 figures and 2 tables
12 figures, 5 tables, accepted for publication in RxMAA
17 pages, 10 figures
Accepted for publication in A&A
8 pages
Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters
10 pages, 8 figures. Matches version accepted for publication in MNRAS
8 page, 3 figures, 1 table, Accepted to ApJ Letters
25 pages, 10 figures
Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
7 pages, 3 figures
Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal on 14 June 2023
19 pages, 3 figures
9 pages, 7 Figures
20 pages, 2 tables, submitted to AAS journals
Accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters
10 pages, 16 figures, 3 tables, published in A&A as DOI: this https URL
14 pages, 8 figures, 2 appendices; published in MNRAS
19 pages, 14 figures
8 pages, 3 figures. Published on 28 October 2021 in MNRAS
26 pages, 13 figures, submitted to the Astrophysical Journal
11 pages, 12 figures, Accepted by A&A
23 pages, 6 figures, published in Galaxies
23 pages, 6 figures, published in MNRAS
7 pages, 8 figures; published in A&A 674, L10 (2023)
24+3 pages, 13+4 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics; Abstract abridged
17 pages, 6 figures, ApJ in press
25 pages, 9 figures, submitted to ApJ on April 10, 2023, and revised after reviewer's report
23 pages, 11 figures
PhD Thesis (Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)
15 pages, 18 Figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
18 pages, 9+1 figures, submitted to MNRAS
MNRAS accepted (19 pages, 18 figures, 1 table)
6 pages, 12 figures
13 pages, 20 figures, accepted by MNRAS
Submitted to A&A
14 pages, 9 figures, 8 tables
24 pages, 8 tables, 17 figures, accepted by the Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. The code repository is available at this https URL
Submitted to MNRAS, 18 pages, 5 figures
MNRAS Letters, in press. Blog post about paper at this https URL
24 pages, 8 figures, 8 tables. Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
6 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to 2022 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina (ARGENCON). Presented in 2022 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina (ARGENCON), San Juan, Argentina
11 pages, 11 figures, submitted to MNRAS
22 pages, 7 figures. Published in Galaxies. Only low-resolution figures are included due to size requirements; original high-resolution figures, especially Figure 1, can be obtained from the published paper in the journal
Accepted for Publication in A&A Letters. 4 Figures and 2 tables. Comments are welcome
20 pages, 5 figures, Accepted by ApJ
13 pages, 7 figures. Accepted to JATIS
11 pages, 6 Figures, Accepted for publication in the Journal of High Energy Astrophysics
17 pages, 11 figures and 1 table in the main text; 40 figures and 1 table in the appendix; accepted for publication in MNRAS
22 pages, 14 figures
White paper submitted to the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033; 7 pages, 1 table
4 pages, 2 Figures
Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15 pages
Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Accepted for publication in A&A. 20 pages, 17 figures
Submitted to JCAP
15 pages, 11 figures (excluding appendices). For submission to MNRAS
accepted for publication in MNRAS, 12 pages, 11 figures
22 pages, 15 figures. Comments are welcome
Accepted for publication in A&A
MNRAS accepted. 15 pages, 12 figures
17 pages; 17 figures; Accepted to RASTI
10 pages, 7 figures, Submitted to ApJ
12 pages, 8 figures,3 tables,accepted for publication in PASP
10 pages, 3 figures, Letter accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
21 pp submitted to MNRAS
47 pages, 24 figures
17 pages, 19 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
8 pages, 3 figures, accepted to ICML ML4Astro Workshop. Comments and suggestions are welcome
29 pages, 13 figures, including 8 pages of Appendix. Accepted for publication in ApJ
ApJ, accepted for publication
7 Pages, 4 Figures, Accepted at the ICML 2023 Workshop on Machine Learning for Astrophysics
8 pages, 7 figures
Article in Spanish, PDF document. Other related documents available at this https URL
14 pages, 7 figures
7 pages, 3 figures, submitted to proceedings of High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa conference 2022
12 pages, 7 figures, 1 table
22 pages, 10 figures
9 pages, 2 figures. Public code at: this https URL
13 pages, 7 figures, 1 appendix. Comments are welcome!
41 pages, 4 figures
5+6 pages, 5 figures
21 pages, 16 figures, 1 table. Suggestions of the encouraging reviewer incorporated, now waiting for the second round of referring
26 pages, 15 figures
7 pages, 2 figures
22 pages, 5 figures
16 pages, no figures and tables