How protoclusters evolved from sparse galaxy overdensities to mature galaxy clusters is still not well understood. In this context, detecting and characterizing the hot ICM at high redshifts (z~2) is key to understanding how the continuous accretion from and mergers along the filamentary large-scale structure impact the first phases of cluster formation. We study the dynamical state and morphology of the z=1.98 galaxy cluster XLSSC 122 with high-resolution observations (~5") of the ICM through the SZ effect. Via Bayesian forward modeling, we map the ICM on scales from the virial radius down to the core of the cluster. To constrain such a broad range of spatial scales, we employ a new technique that jointly forward-models parametric descriptions of the pressure distribution to interferometric ACA and ALMA observations and multi-band imaging data from the 6-m, single-dish Atacama Cosmology Telescope. We detect the SZ effect with $11\sigma$ in the ALMA+ACA observations and find a flattened inner pressure profile that is consistent with a non-cool core classification with a significance of $>3\sigma$. In contrast to the previous works, we find better agreement between the SZ effect signal and the X-ray emission as well as the cluster member distribution. Further, XLSSC 122 exhibits an excess of SZ flux in the south of the cluster where no X-ray emission is detected. By reconstructing the interferometric observations and modeling in the uv-plane, we obtain a tentative detection of an infalling group or filamentary-like structure that is believed to boost and heat up the ICM while the density of the gas is low. In addition, we provide an improved SZ mass of $M_{500,\mathrm{c}} = 1.66^{+0.23}_{-0.20} \times 10^{14} \rm M_\odot$. Altogether, the observations indicate that we see XLSSC 122 in a dynamic phase of cluster formation while a large reservoir of gas is already thermalized.
16 pages, 14 figures. Conference Proceedings for AO4ELT7, held in June 2023 in Avignon, France
The Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) is a high contrast imaging instrument that aims to detect and characterize extrasolar planets. GPI is being upgraded to GPI 2.0, with several subsystems receiving a re-design to improve the instrument's contrast. To enable observations on fainter targets and increase stability on brighter ones, one of the upgrades is to the adaptive optics system. The current Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (WFS) is being replaced by a pyramid WFS with an low-noise electron multiplying CCD (EMCCD). EMCCDs are detectors capable of counting single photon events at high speed and high sensitivity. In this work, we characterize the performance of the HN\"u 240 EMCCD from N\"uv\"u Cameras, which was custom-built for GPI 2.0. The HN\"u 240 EMCCD's characteristics make it well suited for extreme AO: it has low dark current ($<$ 0.01 e-/pix/fr), low readout noise (0.1 e-/pix/fr at a gain of 5000), high quantum efficiency ( 90% at wavelengths from 600-800 nm; 70% from 800-900 nm), and fast readout (up to 3000 fps full frame). Here we present test results on the EMCCD's noise contributors, such as the readout noise, pixel-to-pixel variability and CCD bias. We also tested the linearity and EM gain calibration of the detector. All camera tests were conducted before its integration into the GPI 2.0 PWFS system.
To be submitted
In this work, we provide a macroscopic model to predict the radar echo signatures found when a radio signal is reflected from a cosmic-ray or neutrino-induced particle cascade propagating in a dense medium like ice. Its macroscopic nature allows for an energy independent runtime, taking less than 10 s for simulating a single scatter event. As a first application, we discuss basic signal properties and simulate the expected signal for the T-576 beam-test experiment at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). We find good signal strength agreement with the only observed radar echo from a high-energy particle cascade to date.
Submitted to ApJ. 18 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables
The era of the James Webb Space Telescope ushers stellar populations models into uncharted territories, particularly at the high-redshift frontier. In a companion paper, we apply the \texttt{Prospector} Bayesian framework to jointly infer galaxy redshifts and stellar populations properties from broad-band photometry as part of the UNCOVER survey. Here we present a comprehensive error budget in spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling. Using a $z_{\rm phot}>9$ sample, we quantify the systematic shifts stemming from various model choices in inferred stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and age. These choices encompass different timescales for changes in the star formation history (SFH), non-universal stellar initial mass functions (IMF), and the inclusion of variable nebular abundances, gas density and ionizing photon budget. We find that the IMF exerts the strongest influence on the inferred properties: the systematic uncertainties can be as much as 1 dex, 2--5 times larger than the formal reported uncertainties in mass and SFR; and importantly, exceed the scatter seen when using different SED fitting codes. This means that a common practice in the literature of assessing uncertainties in SED-fitting processes by comparing multiple codes is substantively underestimating the true systematic uncertainty. Highly stochastic SFHs change the inferred SFH by much larger than the formal uncertainties, and introduce $\sim 0.8$ dex systematics in SFR and $\sim 0.3$ dex systematics in average age. Finally, employing a flexible nebular emission model causes $\sim 0.2$ dex systematic increase in mass, comparable to the formal uncertainty. This paper constitutes one of the initial steps toward a complete uncertainty estimate in SED modeling.
2 pages, 1 figure, proceeding of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics (SF2A 2023)
Accepted for publication in ApJ, 10 pages, 5 figures, 1 table
16 pages, 9 figures. Submitted to ApJ. Comments welcomed
18 pages, 5 figures. Videos are available at this https URL
28 pages, 7 figures. Accepted by ApJ
8 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
49 pages including 31 pages of appendices and references, 31 figures, A&A, accepted
10 pages, 10 figures. MNRAS accepted
6 pages with 3 figures; Accepted for publication in MNRAS
36 pages, 38 figures
2 pages, no figure
21 pages, 10 figures, Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
12 pages, 15 figures
In Review: MNRAS, Comments are appreciated
17 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables; Accepted for publication in A&A
59 pages, 44 figures, accepted and published by the ApJ
29 pages, accepted for publication in A&A
38 pages, 6 figures. This preprint has not undergone peer review or any post-submission improvements or corrections. The Version of Record of this article is published in Nature Astronomy, Nat Astron (2023), and is available online at this https URL
6 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to A&A
11 pages, 5 figures, final version published in PASA
3 pages, 1 figure
9 pages, 7 Figures and 5 Tables Accepted Monthly Notices of Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
14 pages, 8 figures
10 pages, 8 figures, accepted by ApJ
This manuscript is a revised version of our previous submission titled 'Magnetic Effect on Potential Barrier. Submitted
35 pages, 60 figures, accepted for publication by Astronomy and Astrophysics
6 pages, 1 figure and 3 tables; published in Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics
to appear in Proc. of the mm Universe 2023 conference, Grenoble (France), June 2023, published by F. Mayet et al. (Eds), EPJ Web of conferences, EDP Sciences
Published in ApJL on 2023 October 4, data is available at this https URL
to appear in Proc. of the mm Universe 2023 conference, Grenoble (France), June 2023, published by F. Mayet et al. (Eds), EPJ Web of conferences, EDP Sciences
to appear in Proc. of the mm Universe 2023 conference, Grenoble (France), June 2023, published by F. Mayet et al. (Eds), EPJ Web of conferences, EDP Sciences
13 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
16 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
18 pages, 16 figures
16 pages, 12 figures + appendix. Accepted in Astronomy & Astrophysics
10 pages, 10 figures
Submitted to MNRAS. Comments are welcome
10 pages + appendices, 9 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted to AJ, 22 pages, 14 figures, 5 tables
16 pages, 11 figures, submitted to the Astrophysical Journal
12 pages, 12 figures, MNRAS in press
35 pages, 13 figures, 5 tables. Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
15 pages, 7 figures. Published in Physical Review D
Submitted to MNRAS Letters
34 pages, submitted to AAS
23 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ)
10 pages, 7 figures, to be published in Astronomy & Astrophysics
18 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
Astronomy and Astrophysics under review
41 pages, 20 figures, 3 table, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal
5 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal
26 pages, 22 figures, submitted to A&A
30 pages, 22 figures, Accepted in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Accepted in MNRAS on 6th October 2023
13 pages, 11 figures
12 pages, 5 figures
15 pages, 3 figures
10 pages, 5 figures
15+ 11 pages, 7 figures
21 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
24 pages, 12 figures
10 pages, 1 figure, 1 table, Proceedings of the 34th IUPAP Conference on Computational Physics (CCP2023), Kobe, Japan, Aug. 4-8, 2023
11 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables
20 pages, 8 figures